Legal Opinion

Earhart v. Middendorf

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 13, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

The question involved in this appeal is whether chauffeurs who drive taxicabs which are operated for hire, but not between fixed termini or over any regular route, must pay the license fee of $12.50 prescribed by section 2739j-32 of Baldwin’s 1928 Supplement to the Statutes, this section being section 32 of chapter 112 of the Acts of 1926, or are liable only for the license fee of $2 provided for by section 2739g-16 of the 1922 Edition of the Statutes; this latter section being section 4 (b) of chapter 90 of the Acts of 1920. The lower court held…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Kentucky Cab Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Talbott, Auditor of Pub. Accts. v. Laffoon, Gov.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Shaw v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Baker v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Cawood v. Coleman, MayorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Board of Registration Com'rs. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API