Legal Opinion
Precision Imaging of New York, P.C. v. Allstate Insurance Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 26, 2017No. 17 Civ. 2567 (JSR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.
By “bottom-line” order dated June 13, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part defendant Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss the complaint. See Order dated June 13, 2017, ECF No. 20. This Memorandum explains the reasons for those rulings.
“To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that' is plausible on its face.’ ” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 127…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- North American Co for Life & Health Ins v. PounceyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024