Cowan v. Federal-Mogul Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal a partial summary judgment dismissing claims sounding in tort, conspiracy and loss of companionship.
Upon careful examination, we affirm. Concerning plaintiff Joseph Cowan’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress brought against defendant Federal-Mogul Corporation, Szydlowski v General Motors Corp, 397 Mich 356; 245 NW2d 26 (1976), controls. Its mandate is clear: Jurisdiction to determine the compensability of injuries arising out of and in the course of employment is reposed initially in the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau. MCL 418.841; MSA 17.237(841). Thus the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Szydlowski v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Pursell v. Wolverine-Pentronix, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sankar v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Buschbacher v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Houghtaling v. ChapmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Johnson v. Arby's, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Demido v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.