Legal Opinion

Demido v. Attorney General

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1980No. Docket No. 43166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this cause summary judgment was entered in favor of the defendants on the ground that the complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. GCR 1963, 117.2(1). Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff brought suit in the circuit court challenging certain provisions of the Public Health Code, MCL 333.1101 et seq.; MSA 14.15(1101) et seq., with respect to the practice of chiropractic. The primary challenge is to § 16401(l)(b) of the code, which excludes from the practice of chiropractic "the performance of incisive surgical procedures, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pursell v. Wolverine-Pentronix, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Sullivan v. Thomas Organization, P.C.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Kuhn v. City of East DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Iowa Department of Health v. Van WykSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Foster v. Georgia Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Zaschak v. Traverse Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Carroll v. Economic Development Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Iowa Department of Health v. Van WykSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API