Legal Opinion

Galloway v. Hutchinson Interurban Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1916No. 19,857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BURCH, J.:

The action was one for damages for personal injuries sustained through the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant appeals.

The defendant operates a double-track street railway running north and south on Main street in the city of Hutchinson. The inside rails of the two tracks are fifty-eight inches apart and the clearance between cars is about a foot. • The plaintiff was a passenger on a northbound car operated on the east track. At a point on Eighth street, which extends east and *111west across Main street, he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Wilson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Marple v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. United States Express Co. v. EverestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Burns v. Metropolitan Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Canestro v. Joplin-Pittsburg RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Lewis v. BarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Ogden v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Curry v. Wichita Railroad & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API