Galloway v. Hutchinson Interurban Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BURCH, J.:
The action was one for damages for personal injuries sustained through the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant appeals.
The defendant operates a double-track street railway running north and south on Main street in the city of Hutchinson. The inside rails of the two tracks are fifty-eight inches apart and the clearance between cars is about a foot. • The plaintiff was a passenger on a northbound car operated on the east track. At a point on Eighth street, which extends east and *111west across Main street, he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Wilson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Marple v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- United States Express Co. v. EverestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Burns v. Metropolitan Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Canestro v. Joplin-Pittsburg RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Lewis v. BarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Ogden v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Curry v. Wichita Railroad & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.