Legal Opinion

Cable v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This appeal involves the statutory construction of the limitations period for occupational disease under the workers’ compensation law, specifically raising the question whether the manifestation of the disease must occur within three hundred weeks after exposure to the hazard or within three hundred weeks after employment in the occupation in which the exposure occurred. This is the sole question in the case, for there is no dispute as to the relevant facts.

Appellee, Kenneth Cable, worked approximately twelve years for appellant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoosier Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. J & L Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Avalotis Painting v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Cable v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Fargo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Ranalli v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Farr v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API