Avalotis Painting v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, President Judge.
Employer Avalotis Painting appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed a referee’s decision granting worker’s compensation benefits to claimant Joseph P. Markulin, under section 301(c)(2) of the Act, Act of June 2,1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 411(2). The employer filed a petition for reconsideration of the board’s decision, which the board denied.
The sole issue the employer raises in this appeal is whether the board erred in concluding that the employer is responsible for workmen’s compensation benefits to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gregorious v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hoosier Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cable v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Kelly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ferraccio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cable v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cable v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.