Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 1986No. C6-86-274PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
A jury found appellant Robert Scott guilty of second degree assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.222 (1984) and fifth degree assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.22 (1984). He was sentenced to twenty-one months to be served consecutively to the sentence he was already serving. Scott’s petition for post-conviction relief was denied and he appeals from that order. On appeal Scott argues that (1) the evidence is not sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, (2) the prosecutor’s statements during closing argument constituted reversible error, (3) the trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. RosilloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HindiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re the Welfare of S.A.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987