Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hindi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1993No. 3015PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal concerns the use and manner of use of videotape as evidence at trial. Appellant alleges, inter alia, that the trial court erred in precluding him from presenting to the jury a videotape in slow motion and/or “freeze frame.” We affirm the judgment of sentence.

Every year, on Labor Day, a live pigeon shoot is held at a local park in Hegins, Pennsylvania. The annual event draws hundreds of people; some come to participate in the shoot, some come to watch the activity and others come solely to protest the shoot. This last group is made up of animal rights activists and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. StarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. FlenorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Channel 20, Inc. v. World Wide Towers Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Cash, O., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. ImpellizzeriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Burkhart v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API