Legal Opinion

Graves v. McConnell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Act No. 534 of the Acts of 1923 provides for a special stock law in certain parts of Howard County, Arkansas, known as the “no-fence district.” Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 contain provisions as to the manner of creating the district and the duties of owners of stock with reference thereto, and the penalty for failure to comply with the provisions thereof.

Section 5 of the act, among other things, provides: “No provision of this ant shall become effective until it has first been approved by a majority of the'qualified electors residing in said described district, at a special election to be held and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Vance v. AustellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  3. Hanson v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Rayder v. WarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Garland Power & Development Co. v. State Board of RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Watson v. GattisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Browning v. WaldripSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Glover v. Hot Springs Kennel ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Langford v. BrandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API