Glover v. Hot Springs Kennel Club
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed P. McPaddin, Associate Justice.
This appeal necessitates a study of Act No. 191 of the 1957 Legislature.1 The question presented is whether it is necessary for the proposition submitted to the voters under § 9 of the Act No. 191 to receive merely a majority of all the votes cast at the election, or must the proposition receive a majority of all of the poll tax holders of the county involved.
The appellee, Hot Springs Kennel Club, Inc., filed action in the Garland Circuit Court against the appellants, being the Garland County Election Commissioners; and prayed inter alia, that the Court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- St. Joseph Township v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Brickhouse v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Vance v. AustellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- State ex rel. Bassett v. RenickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Hawkins v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grand County v. Emery CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Vance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Jennifer McGill, Individually and on Behalf of the Arkansas Canvassing Compliance Committee; And Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Arkansas Secretary of State Local Voters in Charge, a Ballot Question Committee; And Jim Knight, Individually and on Behalf of Local Voters in Charge IntervenorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- Jennifer McGill, Individually and on Behalf of the Arkansas Canvassing Compliance Committee; And Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Arkansas Secretary of State Local Voters in Charge, a Ballot Question Committee; And Jim Knight, Individually and on Behalf of Local Voters in Charge IntervenorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.