Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1990No. 271PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (the “PCHA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9551. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Appellant, William Franklin, was arrested because of an incident involving the murder of Joseph Hollis and the attempted murder of John Pickens. The facts adduced at trial, which were set forth by the lower court in an opinion filed May 24, 1983, may be summarized as follows. The relevant crimes were committed during a meeting on October 22, 1976 which occurred between two rival…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. FioreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WyattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API