Legal Opinion

State v. Stensaker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2007No. 20050453, 20050454PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ryan Stensaker appeals after a jury found him guilty of criminal attempt to manufacture methamphetamine and he conditionally pled guilty to fleeing by vehicle. Concluding that the jury instructions taken as a whole adequately informed the jury on the law and that the intentional gathering and preparation of ingredients, whose purchase, possession, or transportation is regulated by state law, with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine provides sufficient evidence for criminal attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, we affirm.

I

[¶2] In May 2005, the State charged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MoosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. SaboNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CrisslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API