Legal Opinion

State v. Crissler

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2017No. 20170126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Arthur Lee Crissler appeals a district court judgment after a jury convicted him of possessing a weapon in a correctional facility. Because sufficient evidence was presented to support the jury’s verdict, and the testimony regarding the potential use and composition of an altered pencil was admissible, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On October 13, 2016, the State charged Crissler with possessing an object in a correctional facility intended to be used for an assault on another person or to damage property. The charges arose from the search of Crissler’s cell block on September 3, 2016…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. KnowelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. WickhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. McGowenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. McGowenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. WickhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API