Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1938No. Civil No. 3915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

The City of Phoenix, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Ben Pasqualetti, hereinafter called defendant, under the provisions of sections 4385-4390, Revised Code, 1928, commonly known as the Declaratory Judgment Act, to secure the judgment of the court as to the validity of the following agreement between plaintiff and defendant:

“Agreement

‘ ‘ This Agreement . . . Witnesseth: . . .

“I
“That second party shall collect all first class garbage from all places except private residences within that section of the City of Phoenix, lying and being between Seventh Street and Seventh…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Wightman v. Evanston Yaryan Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pool v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Stansell v. FlemingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Barnes v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowling v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Engelbrecht v. McCulloughArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Peabody Seating Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Morris v. Southwest Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Weaver v. Synthes, Ltd.(USA)Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API