Legal Opinion
Block v. First Blood Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1988No. 86 Civ. 8811 (RWS), 87 Civ. 4128 (RWS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Andrew G. Vajna (“Vajna”) and Mario P. Kassar (“Kassar”) in Block, et al. v. First Blood Assocs., et al., No. 86 Civ. 8811 (“Block”), have renewed their motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Stanley B. Block (“Block”) for lack of jurisdiction, and all of the Block defendants have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Block has moved for class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 and Local Rule 4(c) of the Civil Rules for the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Arochem International, Inc., Arochem Corporation and William R. Harris v. Harold W. BuirkleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Osher v. SCA REALTY I, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Straker v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.