Arochem International, Inc., Arochem Corporation and William R. Harris v. Harold W. Buirkle
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants AroChem International, Inc., AroChem Corporation (collectively “Aro-Chem”), and William R. Harris brought the instant matter against Harold Buirkle for defamation and for tortious interference with a contractual and commercial relationship. A jury trial commenced, and, at the close of the plaintiffs’ main case, Judge Stanton directed a verdict in favor of Buir-kle. He held that California law governed and that Buirkle’s allegedly defamatory statements were privileged. 767 F.Supp. 1243. Additionally, Judge Stanton held that Harris and AroChem had failed to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Curley v. AMR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Krock v. LipsayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.