Legal Opinion

Holt v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1960No. Civ. 19557PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

Petitioner is the mother of three minor children. At the instigation of a probation officer three proceedings are pending in respondent court to declare the three children wards of that court.

Petitioner, prior to hearings upon the proceedings below, moved in respondent court to inspect a certain probationary report submitted by the probation officer and read by the judge below. There is a conflict in the record as to whether a report has ever been filed. Petitioner contends that filing was made. Respondents deny such filing. The motion was denied. That denial forms the basis for this petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flakoll v. HalamudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. In Re Matter of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. In Re FloranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In Re JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. Michael B.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. Eugene R.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Botka v. Sandra T.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. People v. L. S.California Court of Appeal · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API