Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 11, 2001No. CIV. A. S-99-1351PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMALKIN, District Judge.

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Miles & Stockbridge’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and to Reconsider are presently before the Court. Miles & Stockbridge’s request for a hearing is denied, as no oral hearing is necessary to decide this matter. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.). For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and for Reconsideration will be GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.

In its March 13, 2001 Memorandum Opinion & Order in this case, this Court held that Parler & Wobber was negligent in recommending settlement…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Carrero v. FarrellyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Wootten v. VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  3. Medlock v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  4. Byrd v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  5. Carrero v. FarrellyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API