Legal Opinion

MacIoce v. Glinatsis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1987No. 360PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

We are asked to construe Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 2959(f) and determine whether a lien obtained by confession of judgment may be impaired, upon a stay of execution, by granting a judgment debtor access to certain garnisheed bank accounts without substitution of security. We think not, and reverse the order granting such access.

A complaint for confession of judgment was filed by Domenic A. Macioce and Anita M. Macioce (hereinafter the Macioces) against Peter M. Glinatsis. Pursuant to the Macioces’ complaint a confession of judgment was entered in the amount of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Rochester MacHine Corp. v. Mulach Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Giles v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Sanctis v. LagerbuschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Adams v. James L. Leeds Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Aspen Data Graphics, Inc. v. Boulton (In Re Aspen Data Graphics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Decatur Contracting v. Belin, Belin & NaddeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Hagel v. United Lawn Mower Sales & Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. McGonigle v. CurrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API