Legal Opinion

Smith v. O'Neill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1991No. D-0953PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding, Relator Jeff F. Smith (“Smith”) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to hear evidence and rule upon Smith’s First Amended Motion to Reinstate Probation and to Dissolve Injunction. Pursuant to Rule 122 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, without hearing oral argument, a majority of the court conditionally grants the writ of mandamus.

In 1987, the State Bar of Texas (“State Bar”) filed a disciplinary action against Smith for professional misconduct. In May 1988, Smith and the State Bar entered into an Agreed Judgment in which they agreed that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sonwalkar v. St. Luke's Sugar Land Partnership, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks v. Mayor Sylvester Turner and City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. City of San Antonio v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kubala Public Adjusters, Inc. v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee for the Supreme Court, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Thomas G. Schuring and Rose M. Schuring v. Fosters Mill Village Community Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API