Bint v. Doe
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fer CURIAM.
Defendants Roger Brock and Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. (defendants), appeal by leave granted the trial court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing and denying defendants’ motion for summary disposition. We affirm.
Defendants argue that the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary disposition because MCL 600.2957(2) does not extend the period of limitations for parties added pursuant to MCR 2.112(K). We disagree. We review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary disposition based on MCR 2.116(C)(7). *234Coleman v Kootsillas, 456 Mich…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Holton v. A+ Insurance Associates, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Staff v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Joliet v. PitoniakMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Coleman v. KootsillasMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Edge v. EdgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re Burnett EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Snyder v. Advantage Health PhysiciansMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re MaynardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Ducharme v. DucharmeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.