Legal Opinion

Labor Commissioner v. Littlefield

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2007No. 46326PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we address whether the Labor Commissioner’s decision to delete soils tester and equipment greaser classifications from his annual prevailing wage publication constituted ad hoc rulemaking, in violation of the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act (APA).1 Because the addition, deletion, or substantial modification of worker classifications under prevailing wage laws establishes a directive of general applicability instructing whether certain worker groups are entitled to the applicable prevailing wage, we conclude that such determinations constitute rulemaking activity…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, (3 Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. S.O.C., Inc. v. Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commissioner of Insurance of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Department of Conservation & Natural Resources v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  2. DUONG, M.D. VS. FIELDEN HANSON ISAACS MIYADA ROBISON YEH, LTDNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State, Department of Taxation v. Chrysler Group LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Jones v. GhadiriNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Mm Dev. Co., Inc. v. Tryke Companies So Nv, LlcNevada Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API