Legal Opinion
Roger J. Lundy v. Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant, U.S.D.B.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-3129PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner is granted leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or, fees. Both sides have fully briefed the issues. Therefore, we may decide this case on the merits.
In 1985, petitioner was convicted of intent to commit rape by a general court martial. 1 He was sentenced to nine years imprisonment, forfeiture of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Noyd v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gusik v. SchilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Solomon Monk, Also Known as David L. Martin v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Mendrano v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Rafi Dhakaa Khan v. Col. William L. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Miller v. United States ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022