Legal Opinion

Chantal Eldridge v. Putnam County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 18, 2001No. M2000-02963-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEN H. CANTRELL, P.J., M.S.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, J. and WALTER C. KURTZ, Sp. J., joined.

I

This is a case about the Open Records Act as applied to the telephone records of a Drug Task Force. After the Chancery Court of Putnam County ordered the County to produce the records, the County appealed, arguing that the records fit an exception to the Act or that the County should be able at the plaintiffs expense to redact the records to delete confidential information. We modify the chancellor’s order to allow the County to redact the records at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballard v. HerzkeTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Arnold v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Memphis Publishing Co. v. HoltTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Tennessean, a Division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Electric Power Board of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swift v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. Schneider v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. The Tennessean v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  4. The Tennessean v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County - DissentingTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API