Legal Opinion
Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Fisch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 21, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 for a permanent stay of arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered June 26, 1996, which granted the application.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
*523Sally and Oscar Fisch invested their retirement savings with the petitioner, Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated (hereinafter Kidder), through their broker, the petitioner James P. Dolan, Jr. In 1996 the Fischs demanded arbitration before the American Arbitration…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barney v. STONEMOR OPERATING LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- May v. AnspachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005