Legal Opinion

Manger v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1957No. [No. 169, October Term, 1956.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

On June 1, 1956, there became effective Chapter 116 of the Acts of the General Assembly of that year, adding to Code, 1956 Supp., Art. 35, Secs. 100 to 107, both inclusive, as well as to Code, 1951, Art. 27, Sec. 670A. We will hereinafter sometimes refer to Chapter 116 as “the Act”. The Act (a) made wire-tapping illegal unless authorized by order of court issued beforehand on the verified statement of named law enforcement officials that a specified crime has been or is about to be committed, and (b) said in Sec. 105 that “Only evidence obtained in conformity with the provisions of this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. State v. SiegelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Robert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Palmer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API