Legal Opinion

Tucker v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1957No. 34438PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Davis

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when the truck he was driving collided with defendant’s freight train at a grade crossing. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $12,250 and the trial court entered judgment thereon. The Appellate Court reversed this judgment on the ground that the trial court should have allowed defendant’s motion for a directed verdict because plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We granted leave to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court.

The determinative question presented to us is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. OswaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Briske v. Village of BurnhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dee v. City of PeruIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Robinson v. WorkmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. PearsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. National Bank v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mort v. WalterIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pennington v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API