Legal Opinion

United States v. Dougherty

District Court, D. Montana

Decided December 28, 1921No. 86PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States against Patrick Dougherty.

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

In this suit to cancel a patent for 120 acres of land (issued to defendant in 1917 upon final proof in 1916 in respect to his homestead entry of 1913), the bill alleges defendant secured the patent by fraud, in that therein he falsely represented that no one claimed or worked the land for mining purposes, that upon it were no indications of minerals, and that it was essentially nonmineral land, whereas in truth and fact defendant then was claiming and working the land for minerals, and it was essentially mineral in character.

[1] The evidence is that the land is about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Clark Montana Realty Co. v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1914
  4. United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1917
  5. United States v. KostelakDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1924
  2. United States v. Central Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API