Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 8, 1917No. 82PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States against Carl Anderson.

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

In this suit to annul a homestead patent, the charge is that defendant procured the patent by fraud, in that for the required period he did not establish and continuously maintain residence upon the land. The answer denies.

[1] The settled law is that, in a court'of equity, like any other contract, a patent, a solemn grant over the seal of and by the United State's *649and presumptive tHat the patentee performed all conditions precedent to its issuance, cannot be annulled for fraud, unless the evidence is unequivocal, clear, and convincing, in quality and quantity that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clarkson v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Ilardi v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Gallup American Coal Co. v. LiraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. United States v. DoughertyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API