1726 Cherry Street Partnership v. Bell Atlantic Properties, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
In this contract case we revisit the issue of whether the parol evidence rule precludes admission of evidence of allegedly fraudulent misrepresentations made during negotiations leading to written agreements, where the alleged misrepresentations concern a subject specifically dealt with in the agreements. We conclude that the bar of the parol evidence rule applies and, therefore, affirm.
The genesis of this case was a commercial transaction in which two parcels of Center City Philadelphia real estate were sold and conveyed by plaintiffs — appellants, Barton J. Winokur, Sonia…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Betz Laboratories, Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Dayhoff Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Douglas E. Wall v. Csx Transportation, Inc. And Consolidated Rail Corporation, Docket No. 05-4065-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.