Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1989No. C0-89-1838Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

This motion for release pending appeal was presented, for emergency consideration one day following the sentencing hearing, at which appellant received a 30-day sentence for gross misdemeanor driving while intoxicated. A motion for release pending appeal was first presented to the trial court, and was denied. See Minn.R. Crim.P. 28.02, subd. 7(3). An appeal has been filed.

This court has denied the motion for release pending appeal, referring to this panel the question of emergency consideration of such motions. Although we note appellant’s motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Brussel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mecom v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. WeismanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  5. United States v. Mary D. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API