Legal Opinion

United States v. Mary D. Hart

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1985No. 85-2590PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This matter is before the court on defendant-appellant’s motion for release pending appeal, appellee’s response thereto, and a bail record.

Appellant stands convicted, upon a guilty plea, of distribution of a controlled substance. She was sentenced to imprisonment for one year. The district court allowed voluntary surrender at the designated place…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Breck M. SwanquistCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re William SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Pisano v. ShillingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Pisano v. ShillingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API