Hilderbrand v. National Electrical Benefit Fund
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge.
Plaintiff Dennis Hilderbrand challenges the National Electrical Benefit Fund’s (NEBF) decision to deny him disability benefits for the period of March 2005 through October 2008. Cross motions for summary judgment are pending. Because the NEBF Trustees failed to consider reliable, contrary evidence submitted by Hil-derbrand, Hilderbrand’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 12) is GRANTED IN PART and the cause is remanded to the NEBF Trustees for a de novo benefits *802determination. The NEBF’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 13) is DENIED.
I. FACTS
The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.