Legal Opinion

Cody v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1988No. 86-802PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this personal injury action, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants and the trial court entered judgment on the verdict. Plaintiff, William Frederick Cody, asserts error with regard to the court's instructions to the jury, rulings on objections to evidence, and submission of affirmative defenses to the jury.

Cody was injured when a boxcar door fell on him. He was employed by International Paper Company ("I.P."). He was injured while he and another I.P. employee, Walter Nettles, were attempting to close the boxcar door. There was evidence that the top track on which the door traveled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Burroughs Corp. v. Hall Affiliates, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Grayco Resources, Inc. v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Record Data Intern., Inc. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Co. v. StaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. D & N Trucking, L.L.C. v. BrewerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Procter & Gamble Co. v. StaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Procter & Gamble Co. v. StaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API