Foster v. Lumbermen's Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee. (Grant, J.) Trover for the conversion of a quantity of lean iron ore. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
This is an action of trover to recover for the conversion of a quantity of lean ore, taken from the Ludington mine, and lying on the premises, and claimed by the plaintiff to be his property. The pile was estimated to contain about 14,000 tons, and was not uncommonly called “refuse rock.” The record shows that ore yielding less than 50 per cent, of iron is usually regarded as unsalable.
The land upon which the mine was located belonged to the Lake Superior Ship-canal, Railway & Iron Company, and was operated by the defendant under a lease from that company, by which the defendant was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Parish v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Croze v. St. Mary's Canal Mineral Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Brooks v. Federal Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Paull v. Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Kentucky RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.