Legal Opinion

Paull v. Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Kentucky Railroad

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Circuit Court, Ohio- County. Action by Lee S. Pauli against tbe Pittsburgh, Wheeling & Kentucky Kailroad Company. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Judge:

The plaintiff sues in assumpsit to recover of defendant five thousand dollars damages for breach of contract. Succinctly stated, the contract averred is that plaintiff, a married woman, her husband joining, conveyed to defendant a lot in Wheeling, for $660 actually paid, with the further oral agreement that in the event defendant purchased any other of the lots described in the declaration as contiguous to or near' the lot conveyed by her it would pay her as further compensation the difference between $660' and the sum, whatever it might be, at which defendant should purchase any…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Gelston v. SigmundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  3. Pulliam v. SchimpfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bourne v. Sherrill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. KoontzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API