Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Federal Surety Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 5, 1928No. 4613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The appellants, Brooks, Smith & Coane, as plaintiffs below, sued the Lorberry Coal & Mining Company, as principal, and the Federal Surety Company, as surety, for damages because of an alleged breach by the mining company of a written contract between it and plaintiffs for the sale of a certain quantity of mined coal. The surety company alone was served with process, and the 'Cause proceeded against it as sole defendant. At the trial the lower court directed a verdict for the defendant, and judgment was entered thereon. This appeal followed.

The controlling question in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. United Press v. . New York Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Velie Motor Car Co. v. Kopmeier Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. Joliet Bottling Co. v. Joliet Citizens' Brewing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Taller & Cooper v. Illuminating Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Lerman v. Fruit Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API