Legal Opinion

Matter of Trulove

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 8110SC478PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

I

We determine first whether the superior court erred in concluding that the Board did not hear the charge within the time frame required by G.S. 89C-22(b). The resolution of this issue turns on our construction of G.S. 89C-22 which provides, in relevant part:

Discpilinary action —charges; procedure.(a) Any person may prefer charges of fraud, deceit, gross negligence, incompetence, misconduct, or violation of the rules of professional conduct, against any individual registrant or against any corporation holding a certificate of authorization. Such charges shall be in writing and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Jackson v. BobbittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Parrish v. North Carolina Real Estate Licensing BoardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Justice v. EakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Farlow v. North Carolina State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. North Carolina Medical Society v. North Carolina Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Matter of BruceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. North Carolina State Bar v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API