Legal Opinion

City of Manila v. Downing

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1968No. 5-4532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a suit brought by the appellee, the duly elected recorder of the city of Manila, for a declaratory decree determining the validity of a 1967 ordinance by which the city attempted to reduce her salary during her term of office. The controlling issue is whether Act 124 of 1961 (a) merely amended, a section of an 1875 statute on the subject, as Mrs. Downing contends, or (b) repealed it altogether, as the city contends. This appeal is from a declaratory decree upholding Mrs. Downing’s contention that the 1875 statute, as far as cities of the second class are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TrulockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Brockman v. Bd. of Dirs. of Jefferson Bridge Dist.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Hall v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1994
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API