Brockman v. Bd. of Dirs. of Jefferson Bridge Dist.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). The appellant seeks to collect fees against certain delinquent lands of the district embraced in this suit and have them, taxed against each particular tract described therein as costs for his compensation for the collection of the delinquent taxes for 1929 and 1930 as provided in said act 121 of 1921.
He alleged that said act making provision for the collection of delinquent taxes ivas enacted long prior to the adoption of amendment No. 12 to the Constitution, prohibiting the passage of local acts by the Legislature, and that by its terms he was entitled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Purnell v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- State ex rel. Thurston County v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Gregory v. CockrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte OldenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- City of Manila v. DowningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Simons v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.