Legal Opinion

Armstrong & Armstrong, Inc. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided January 3, 1973No. Civ. 2780PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POWELL, District Judge.

This is a civil action by Armstrong & Armstrong, Inc. against the United States of America and Rogers C. B. Morton as Secretary of the Interior. The agency alleged to be responsible for the damages claimed by the plaintiff is the Bureau of Reclamation, a sub-agency of the Department of the Interior. The plaintiff was determined to be an unsuccessful bidder on a government contract for construction work described by the invitation to bid as:

“Lake Chelan Pumping Plant Discharge Line and Regulating Tank, Manson Unit, Washington Chelan Division, Chief Joseph Dam…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Armstrong & Armstrong, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Sardella Construction Co. v. Braintree Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. McCarty Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API