Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Hamblin
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 30, 1972No. 3-72-Civ.-115PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEYITT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants’ rules and procedures for terminating water service violate equal protection and due process standards. Plaintiffs contend that utility services fall within constitutional protections; that they are entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard before service is terminated; and that defendants’ practice of terminating service to those who are not legally obligated to pay for such service violates their right to equal protection of the laws.
The matter has been submitted…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Geraldine Sterling v. Village of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Cook v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
- Koger v. GuarinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Dawes v. Philadelphia Gas CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.