Legal Opinion
Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. Grindstaff
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 16, 1941No. 2143PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FUNDERBURK, Justice.
This is a suit upon a hail insurance policy. E. M. Grindstaff, the insured, as plaintiff, alleged that Twin City Fire Insurance Company, the defendant, had issued to him the policy insuring his two-thirds interest in a crop of barley upon a 52-acre tract of land; that the crop was, on June 28, 1940 (within the coverage period), damaged by hail to the extent of 60 per cent, or $6 per acre; that ten acres at the time of the hail had been harvested, for which credit was given upon the claim by limiting it to $252. One allegation was that said “policy" is what is known as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- National Liberty Ins. Co. v. Herring Nat. Bank of VernonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Insurance Co. of North America v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Hicks.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joseph J. Morreale v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Billmayer v. Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
- Williford v. Southern Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958