Legal Opinion

Sarver v. Barrett Ace Hardware, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1976No. 47763PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

Plaintiff, Ronald Sarver, sued in the circuit court of Will County for personal injuries allegedly caused by the unreasonably dangerous condition of defendants’ product. When plaintiff failed to comply with certain discovery orders, his attorney was found guilty of contempt. The appellate court reversed the contempt order. (29 Ill. App. 3d 195.) We granted defendants’ petition for leave to appeal under Rule 315 (58 Ill.2d R. 315). We reverse the appellate court.

Sarver alleged that, while using a hammer manufactured by defendant Estwing Manufacturing Company and sold by defendant Barrett Ace…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Petruk v. South Ferry Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  5. Sarver v. Barrett Ace Hardware, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Balciunas v. DuffIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API