Legal Opinion
In Re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 15, 2020No. 1:15-cv-07488Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation No. 15 Civ. 7488 (CM) OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS McMahon, C.J.: Following this Court’s preliminary approval of a settlement in this pharmaceutical direct purchaser antitrust class action for $750,000,000 (Dkt. No. 947), Class counsel made a timely motion for fees, expenses and incentive awards. (ECF Nos. 925-28.) Class counsel originally sought 27.5% of the common fund (or an award of X), reimbursement of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- In Re Union Carbide Consumer Prod. Bus. SEC. Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Sea Spray Holdings, Ltd. v. Pali Financial Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.