Legal Opinion
Associates in Periodontics, PLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 18, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00171Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ASSOCIATES IN PERIODONTICS, ) PLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:20-cv-171 ) THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Associates in Periodontics, PLC (“Plaintiff”) brings this case as a putative class action against Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”), seeking insurance coverage for losses suffered during Plaintiff’s COVID-19 business closure. Pending before the Court is Cincinnati’s motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matson v. BD. OF EDUC., CITY SCHOOL DIST. OF NYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.