Legal Opinion

Durham v. . Public Service Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Trial by jury was waived by the parties.

The action is to recover the sum of $102,942.30, assessed against the defendant company for its proportion of the cost of paving the Main Street of said city on which the tracks of defendant, a street railway, are laid. Defendant having refused to make the improvement as required by a city ordinance, the work was done by the city and assessed against the company as the statute provides. There is no claim but that the proceedings were formally correct, but defendant resists recovery on the ground that the company is protected by a clause in the license…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Sioux City Street Railway Co. v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad v. AlsbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynard v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. City of Raleigh v. Mechanics & Farmers BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API