Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General Motors
Oregon Supreme Court
1ConcurrencePeterson, J.
I concur with the opinion of the court in all respects except one. I disassociate myself from part III of the opinion, not because I necessarily disagree with what is stated therein, but because that part of the opinion is totally unnecessary to the decision of this case, involves questions not raised or considered in either the trial court or the Court of Appeals and not argued or discussed by the parties, and adopts significant rules of law on important controversial questions without the issues being presented, contended for, briefed, or argued.
*615It is clear that the parties, from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hendrix v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.