Legal Opinion

Kolatch v. I. Rome & Sons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1924No. 18754PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment discharging and cancelling a dissolution or discharge bond given to obtain the release of property held under garnishment. The appeal comes here on the transcript of the record, no statement of facts being brought up, and the only question involved is whether or not the findings support the third and fourth conclusions of law and judgment. The findings and conclusions, omitting formal parts, are as follows:

“III.

“That on July 13,1922, plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant, Rochester "Wholesale House, by the terms of which the Rochester Wholesale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leonard v. SpeidelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Petri v. MannyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Campbell v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Eveleth v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. King v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kolatch v. I. Rome & SonsWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API